Thursday, November 7, 2024

The freedom of the press still furnishes that check upon government which no constitution has ever been able to provide – Chicago Tribune.

HomeVolume 27Vaping 'a crucial tool to reduce inequalities for Indigenous Territorians'

Vaping ‘a crucial tool to reduce inequalities for Indigenous Territorians’

LETTER TO THE ALICE SPRINGS NEWS

A new study published in the Medical Journal of Australia has found Indigenous people in the Northern Territory have a life expectancy 15 years less than the general population, with the gap unlikely to be eliminated for a further 60 years.

The leading cause of this health gap is smoking and urgent action is needed to address this glaring inequality.

The smoking rate of Indigenous Australian adults is three times higher than non-Indigenous people. In 2019, 43.4% of Indigenous adults smoked, compared to 15% of non-Indigenous adults.

The gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous smoking rates has not reduced since 1995 despite the Closing the Gap program and hundreds of millions of dollars spent on ineffective strategies, not to mention Australia now commanding the highest cigarette prices in the world.

These eye-watering prices are a major source of financial hardship and poverty for Indigenous smokers as it leads to compromises in diet, clothing, accommodation, and other basic necessities.

But the Australian government continues to deny Indigenous people – like all Australian smokers – easy legal access to the most effective quitting aid, vaping nicotine.

Vaping is twice as effective as a quitting aid as nicotine replacement therapies such as nicotine patches and gum and is at least 95% safer than smoking, according to the UK Royal College of Physicians.

It is no surprise that vaping is the most popular quitting aid in countries where it is available.

The opportunity for vaping to reduce Indigenous smoking was demonstrated recently by its impact on Māori smoking in New Zealand where legislation to legalise vaping was passed in August 2020.

Māori daily smoking rates subsequently fell by an unprecedented 22% in 12 months from 2020 to 2021, according to the Annual New Zealand Health Survey.

This fall in smoking rates was almost certainly due to a corresponding uptake of vaping by Māori smokers.

Māori smokers have embraced vaping as a safer alternative to deadly cigarettes and have an adult daily vaping rate considerably higher than the general population: 15.3% compared to a national average of 5.8% [source: New Zealand Health Survey 2020-21].

Similar reductions in Indigenous smoking could be expected in Australia if vaping was more readily available.

However, restricted access to nicotine vaping products in Australia makes it almost impossible for disadvantaged people to obtain nicotine supplies legally. Australia is the only western democracy to ban the sale and use of nicotine for vaping without a prescription.

Although vaping is an approved and legitimate quitting aid in Australia, very few doctors are trained in vaping or in prescribing nicotine.

Another barrier is the need to order nicotine online and import it from overseas websites; a challenging process for vulnerable and disadvantaged smokers.

As a result, it is perversely much harder to purchase far safer vape products than deadly cigarettes. Instead, under the current regulations, many vapers are forced to access dodgy supplies from a thriving black market which offers no consumer protection and sells freely to young people.

Beyond its substantial health benefits, vaping would also have a huge financial benefit for disadvantaged Indigenous smokers. Vaping is about 10% of the cost of smoking, leaving thousands of crucial extra dollars every year for the family budget.

If the Australian government is serious about reducing Indigenous smoking, vaping regulations must be urgently changed and brought into line with other western countries.

Regulated vaping products are lifesaving and should be readily available from licensed premises for adult smokers as consumer products to help them quit smoking. Access should be restricted for young people, as with other adult products.

Simple regulatory changes would lead to substantial improvements in the health and financial inequalities currently experienced by Indigenous Territorians. It is the right thing to do.

Dr Colin Mendelsohn MB BS (Hons)

Double Bay NSW

PHOTO: Image from a promotion by Premium Vape “a proudly Kiwi family owned and operated company”.

4 COMMENTS

  1. The learned Doctor needs to peruse the PDF file from the NSW Health Dept which states that Vaping has dangerous health effects on the brain, lungs, etc before he goes recommending it as a solution to the problem of self control.

  2. Scientists in a recent study have used fMRI scans to compare smokers’, vapers’ and non smokers’ lungs. fMRI is the most accurate means to measure the effects of smoking and vaping for human lungs.
    When comparing these effects, it was found that vaping was almost indistinguishable from the effects of not vaping at all. All the proof you need can be found here.

  3. Double the tax on all tobacco products, at least it will help pay costs of smokers being admitted to hospital.
    Vaping is of no help to anyone and maybe the only true study will be concerning lung cancer caused by it.

  4. If there would be a dollar donated to a worthy cause for every study out there which later proved to be misleading, incorrect, or grossly overstated, I’m sure quite a lot of money would come together.
    Just alone the number of studies made in regards to the (positive or negative) implication of drinking coffee, would be in the thousands and most are just that – studies that don’t bear any relevance to the facts except maybe for the interest group that funded them.
    Just because someone is a doctor or professor doesn’t give their study any more credentials, quite the opposite.
    If one should have at least learned one thing over the last two and a half years is that you can’t trust your doctor.
    They are more of a mouthpiece to the medical board and various other “health advocate groups” than to their profession to help their patients.
    At the very LEAST – first do no harm – and they are more concerned about their income and job than the health to the people who trusted them almost blindly.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

error: Content is protected !!