Sunday, August 9, 2020

The freedom of the press still furnishes that check upon government which no constitution has ever been able to provide – Chicago Tribune.

Home Issue 1 Bottle shop cops may not like it, but are needed

Bottle shop cops may not like it, but are needed

p2101-Donna-Ah-Chee
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
 
Sir – In response to the letter of Paul McCue, NT Police Association president.
 
Congress continues to be very sympathetic to the Police Association who continue to represent the views of their members in relation to Point of Sale Intervention (POSI, or “cops at bottle shops”). We appreciate that it is not work that they want to keep doing.
 
Congress fully expects Commissioner Kershaw to ensure that police are doing the required work to maintain law and order and public safety. We appreciate there are many different aspects to this important work and the police are doing a great job and we have never suggested otherwise, however, for now, police on bottle shops full time is a key part of their overall work. Unfortunately, it is still needed.
 
Congress gets that police on bottle shops is by itself insufficient. We are also keen to work with the police association, other stakeholders and government to ensure other key recommendations from the review on alcohol policy – including the alcohol floor price, risk based licensing, the liquor commission and other measures – are in place as quickly as possible.
 
Congress also supports the recommendations of the Riley review including the recommendation to replace police on bottle shops with uniformed licensing inspectors.
 
However, we also support the key recommendation that police do not withdraw their critical work on bottle shops until the new system with the uniformed licensing inspectors is in place. Congress is keen to work with the Police Association to help ensure this happens as soon as possible.
 
Arguments about individual choice are interesting but do nothing to address the fact that POSIs are very effective and when in place they prevent severe alcohol related harms, including premature and tragic deaths from alcohol related violence, suicide and motor vehicle accidents.
 
We also fully understand the need to continue to work very hard on the broader social determinants of the alcohol problem including early childhood, education, employment, housing and the extreme poverty that too many of our people still live in. We don’t support either / or arguments, it is always “both / and”.
 
The Australian Hotels Association has suggested that their NT members alone contribute around $50m per year in taxes. So to suggest that the alcohol industry does not pay anything for police operations is like suggesting that the community do not pay anything for their health care when it is bulk billed through Medicare.
 
These sorts of essential services are rightly paid for by our taxes. Yes, POSIs are discriminatory, and no, they do not resolve underlying issues of addiction and violence and need to be combined with other key alcohol policy reforms.
 
However, it is a very unsound argument that says don’t do anything immediate that will help, especially when we have seen the results.
 
Donna Ah Chee (pictured)
CEO, Central Australian Aboriginal Congress
 
 
 

10 COMMENTS

  1. Dear Australian Hotels Association,
    You seem to be of the belief your members are paying something out of their responsibilities as a business.
    They pay what they have to in taxes! Don’t try and pass it off as an extra on top of what they are required to pay.
    Best not to compare yourself to healthcare either as they help deal with the issues, while alcohol shops cause more trouble than good.
    They should be supplying their own security and calling the cops if something happens.

  2. @ James T Smerk: TRUE. And what they pay is only a drop in all the oceans of just health costs from grog.

  3. A well written article by Donna, all salient points too, BUT what is it that Congress are actually doing or going to do to assist?
    She uses the words support, fully understand, keen to work with, but what will Congress COMMIT to, or even perhaps take the initiative?
    Perhaps donate some of your $30m budget to policing the grog shops. But please don’t use empty words. That’s what the pollies do.

  4. “Welfare / Pension Card.” Food and essential medicine only. No Grog. No smokes. No Cash.
    Welfare is currently 48% of total Oz government budget. Source: Australian government gross debt.

  5. Surprised: You hit the nail on the head, same with other Aboriginal corporations they won’t commit to anything to solve the PROBLEMS.

  6. I say shut all the grog shops down including Woolworth and Coles.
    I am an Arrente man born and bred in Alice Springs, these grog shops don’t give a damn about social issues in this town, they only care about the dollar.
    What is sad is Lhere Artepe is selling grog to their / our own people.

  7. @ Pseudo Guru: It used to be the way. In 1974 welfare recipients received food and the basics of life but not cigarettes and alcohol from Woolworths, which was in Todd Street at the time, at the back door, using food vouchers.

  8. Use your profits to deal with the alcohol abuse. After all you are the only beneficiaries from the sale of alcohol

  9. @1 Eleanor: That would be the same as making car manufacturers responsible for car crashes.
    It appears that most of the grog issues are around Aboriginal people, so surely it’s fair that the Aboriginal health service providers have some skin in the game!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here